toll free 1 800 513 7277

Boosting Sales in the Office Supply Industry (Definitely NOT Dunder Mifflin)

The client company in this case study is in what most would call a “mature” segment of the economy - Corporate Accounts in the Retail Office Supply industry.  While the company had done well for years, like most companies, it was highly interested in increasing its share of this inelastic market. At the same time, the company was experiencing relatively high turnover in its sales positions.

We suggested that an analysis of the sales force, followed by recommendations for selection process changes, could be their solution. The assessment chosen was the Profiles Sales Assessment (PSA). In the first year, two groups of 12 salespeople were assessed, using the PSA: A group of the Top Performers (based on annual sales volume), and a group at the very bottom of annual production, the Bottom Performers. Using the Top Performers to produce a Success Pattern, it was found that the two groups were markedly different in their Match Scores to the pattern; they were even more remarkably different in their sales production.

These results are summarized here:

Note that, while the difference in match score is only 10 percentage
points, it is highly predictive of sales performance!

(This is a quite common finding.)

This company had previously developed documentation of the cost of turn-over in the sales department. When advertising, recruiting, hiring, training, compensation, and termination were figured in, the average cost per turnover was estimated at $15,000!

In the second year, following the recommendations developed from the PSA data, the company applied the PSA as a selection tool, and also used the Management Reports to coach the existing employees and new hires throughout the year.

In the first 10 months of the year, these were the results: Sales turnover dropped from an annual rate of 65.48% to 23.26%, a reduction by two-thirds! 

The company calculated potential annual sales increase available, if all 12 Bottom Performers were replaced by Top Performers:


Over three years, with a turnover rate reduced to an acceptable rate of 25% or less, total costs of the PSA in use were estimated at $36,000.  Even if all of the sales gain were deferred until the end of a three year term, sales volume increase would exceed costs by a factor of 58:1.

As the Bottom Performers continue to be replaced, with potential Top Performers, additional gains will be realized. Ultimately, market share will increase!


You (really) can't believe everything you read

chartJob seekers who have something to hide have more tools at their disposal, than you do to uncover it. Heck, for the swipe of a credit card at CareerExcuse I can get a better cover than most CIA operati...

Hiring Myth #11

chartMyth #11: Not everyone here should be a top performer. We need some Steady Eddies, or we'd drive ourselves nuts trying to satisfy everyone's career expectations.

Strategy is important. But it's not enough.

magnifying class"Culture trumps Strategy", day in and day out. Defining a winning strategy only accounts for 15% of your financial performance against your competition; the balance, a whopping 85%, boils down to exec...

Download the 7 secrets for HiringSmartER
What makes us different?
Join us for coffee (live presentation)